Top News
Humans are driving mammals to go nocturnal  ||   Why we celebrate Juneteenth  ||   Zuckerberg, Sandberg give to record $4 million Facebook campaign to reunite immigrant families  ||   What is Juneteenth? We explain the holiday that commemorates the end of slavery  ||   J.D. Gordon: I am learning what it is like to be caught up in the Russia witch hunt  ||   Elon Musk and Tesla cope with 'sabotage', space crunch for new Model 3 assembly line  ||   Watch man save alligator from the grip of a 10-foot python  ||   How to find the best food when traveling  ||   16-year-old girl dies after 100-foot fall during hike  ||   News media finally calls out Trump on his lies. It took children in cages to make it happen.  ||   National parks: Tour five parks in 360 degrees  ||   Stage set for governor's rule in J&K as all parties rule out any new alliance  ||   Late night hosts call Trump's 'child prisons' 'monstrous and morally repugnant'  ||   Fact check: Viral image of child in a cage was not detained by ICE  ||   Rapper Xxxtentacion shot and killed in South Florida; no arrests or motive yet  ||   IBM shows off an artificial intelligence that can debate a human — and do pretty well  ||   News media finally calls out Trump on his lies. It took children in cages to make it happen.  ||   Clemson, not Alabama, is the safest bet to win a conference title in 2018  ||   BJP-PDP Rift: Key Events  ||   The United States' World Cup failure is looking worse every day  ||            

Supreme Court strikes down political dress code at polls in latest decision involving voting  4 Days ago

Source:   USA Today  

WASHINGTON — Overly broad state laws that ban wearing political messages inside polling places are unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

The 7-2 decision struck down a century-old Minnesota law that was challenged by a voter temporarily turned away for wearing a Tea Party shirt and a "Please I.D. Me" button. During oral argument in February, state officials said the law had not been challenged until now.

Chief Justice John Roberts issued the court's opinion, calling the state's effort to make polling places less clamorous admirable. But unlike some other states, including California and Texas, he said, "Minnesota has not supported its good intentions with a law capable of reasoned application."

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer dissented, saying Minnesota's highest court should have an opportunity to weigh in first. Sotomayor had expressed support for the state law during oral argument in February, noting some people viewed "Please I.D. Me" as a "highly charged political message ... intended to intimidate people to leave the polling booth."

All 50 states regulate campaign advocacy in and around polling places for reasons most of the justices readily defended during oral argument. But only 10 states extend the prohibition to virtually anything deemed political.

Federal district and appeals courts dismissed the complaints from Andrew Cilek and the Minnesota Voters Alliance, but the Supreme Court has been protective of free speech rights even when it disagrees with the message.

Several justices had expressed concern about how to draw a line between banned and acceptable messages. A majority agreed that the right to vote deserves a little peace and quiet; the issue was, how much?

"We see no basis for rejecting Minnesota’s determination that some forms of advocacy should be excluded from the polling place," Roberts said. "In light of the special purpose of the polling place itself, Minnesota may choose to prohibit certain apparel there because of the message it conveys, so that voters may focus on the important decisions immediately at hand."

The problem, Roberts said, is that Minnesota's prohibition doesn't specify what's allowed and what isn't, leaving too much up to the whim of temporary polling place officials. The state bans "issue-oriented material" as well as "material promoting a group with recognizable political views."

"The American Civil Liberties Union, the AARP, the World Wildlife Fund, and Ben & Jerry’s all have stated positions on matters of public concern," Roberts said. "If the views of those groups align or conflict with the position of a candidate or party on the ballot, does that mean that their insignia are banned?"

The case was one of several before the court this term that affect voting, which the justices have quarreled over for years following their landmark 5-4 decision in 2013 striking down a key section of the Voting Rights Act. 

The justices also heard disputes over partisan gerrymandering in Wisconsin and Maryland, racial redistricting in Texas and Ohio's method of purging voters from registration rolls, which they upheld in a 5-4 decision Monday.

The Supreme Court in 1992 upheld a state law establishing 100-foot, campaign-free buffer zones around polling places. That law and others generally apply to active electioneering, not passive wardrobes.

The Minnesota case raised troubling new questions. Can a state prohibit voters from wearing a "Make America Great Again" or "#MeToo" T-shirt? How about displaying the gay rights movement's rainbow flag, or "Parkland Strong" to support the Florida community shaken by February's school shooting?

And why would it be OK to herald First Amendment freedom of speech rights across one's chest, but not Second Amendment rights affecting firearms -- a differentiation Minnesota allowed? 

"The problem is that so many things have political connotations," Justice Samuel Alito said in February. "There are always going to be hard calls."

Justice Anthony Kennedy, on the other hand, wondered if the polling place should be a politics-free zone.

"Why should there be any speech there at all?" he said. "You're there to vote."


More News
About Us Terms & Conditions Disclaimer
Advertise Contact
register and win

NRIS.COM is one of the premier NRI website that provides a range of resourceful services to Indian expats residing in the USA. Visiting the site you will find comprehensive information related to restaurants, casinos, pubs, temples, carpool, movies, education, real estate, and forums. The simple and easy to navigate format allows NRIs to gain information within a fraction of a second. Moreover, advertising through its column of Indian free classifieds in USA allow businesses to improve visibility of their brand.

MI NRI's Chat (0 Users Online)